DR. DANE BOYLES
  • Home
  • About
  • Ministry
  • Publications
  • Recent Reflections
  • Contact

Learning to See: Nicodemus and the Two Dimensions of the World  —  John 3

7/2/2026

0 Comments

 

     It is night, and a careful man has come with a question he could not ask in daylight.
     Nicodemus was a teacher, a ruler, a man used to understanding things. He came to Jesus with what sounds like a settled conclusion: “We know you have come from God, for no one could do these signs unless God were with him.” He had watched, he had weighed the evidence, and he had reasoned his way to a respectful verdict. He had seen accurately.
     And Jesus answered him with what seems, at first, to have nothing to do with the question: “Unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
Notice the word. Not enter first, but see. Before anything else, Jesus puts His finger on a problem of vision. Nicodemus does not need more information first. He needs another kind of sight.
     He stumbles exactly where we would expect a careful man to stumble. “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter his mother’s womb a second time?” It is a fair question, if you are reading only by natural process. Nicodemus knows how birth works. He has observed it, measured it, filed it under the fixed laws of the world he can touch. And by those laws, being born again is nonsense. That is the difficulty, and it is ours as much as his. Nicodemus was trying to understand a spiritual reality with an instrument built only for the material one.
     Jesus draws the two apart so we can see them clearly: “That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.” He is showing him that reality is larger than the visible world. There is flesh, and there is Spirit — what human beings can perceive naturally, and what only God can reveal. One is the world our senses were made for: the seen, the measurable, the world that arrives through eye and ear and touch and lands in the brain as information. The other is the whole unseen order that our senses were never built to reach — and its living heart is the Spirit of God, unmastered by us. Each dimension must be perceived according to its own nature. You cannot weigh the wind on a scale, and you cannot reach the unseen — least of all the Spirit of God — through the five senses.
     Then Jesus reaches for exactly that picture: “The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So is everyone born of the Spirit.”
     You never see the wind itself. You see the branch move; you hear the sound in the trees; you feel it on your face. You know the wind by its effects. It stays invisible, and yet no one standing in a storm doubts that it is real. This is often the shape of the unseen: it does not show itself directly, but shows itself by what it moves. And there is a quiet warning inside the image. A way of seeing that trusts only what it can measure will register the moving branches and miss the wind. It will record the effects and deny the cause. It sees the facts and stops there.
     This is why Jesus, a few verses later, says something that ought to arrest us: “We speak of what we know and testify of what we have seen, and you do not receive our testimony.” He is not the one straining to perceive. He is the one who sees clearly, who understands without gap or confusion how the unseen and the seen are joined, and He is speaking to sincere, intelligent people who cannot follow Him — not because they lack goodwill, but because they lack the right kind of sight.
     That raises the real question of the passage. Not simply, “Is the unseen there?” but, “Which reality is ruling?”
     Scripture answers that from its first page and never wavers. In the beginning, the unseen God speaks, and the seen world comes into being. The Spirit is the cause; the material world is the effect. Again and again, the miracles press the same truth home. Israel walks out of Egypt, not by the strength of an army, but by an unseen power bending visible events toward freedom. The sea opens. Bread comes from heaven. Water comes from rock. The pattern becomes unmistakable: when the unseen God acts, the visible world answers. This is why Jesus can tell Nicodemus, in effect, that there is nothing strange about this. The unseen God has always been ruling the visible world. Jesus is only asking him to notice.
     Then Jesus does something remarkable. He reaches back across Israel’s history to a strange scene in the wilderness, and He uses it to explain His own mission.
The people had been bitten by serpents. They were dying. The poison was already in the blood, and there was no natural remedy left — no cutting it out, no waiting it off, no managing it with human strength. And God told Moses to lift up a bronze serpent on a pole, and said that anyone who had been bitten would live by looking at it. Just look, and live.
     But of course it was never merely looking. The power was not in the metal. The power was in the God who attached His promise to that lifted sign. A dying man had to turn his eyes toward the one thing God had appointed and trust it — trust that the cure lay outside himself, in something lifted up before him, when everything in his body was telling him he was finished. He had to read his situation by revelation rather than by the poison in his veins. The ones who lived were the ones who looked in faith.
“As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness,” Jesus says, “so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him should have eternal life.”
     Here the whole teaching about seeing arrives at its point. Jesus did not come to condemn the world, but to save it. He is the One lifted up, and we are the ones with poison in the blood, and the summons is the same as it was in the wilderness: look, and live. But looking, then and now, means turning from what our situation appears to be telling us and trusting what God has revealed. It is an act of perception before it is anything else.
     And Nicodemus is not alone in this failure of sight; even the disciples had to learn it. They had just watched Jesus feed thousands from almost nothing, had watched the material world stretch past its limits under an unseen hand. Then a storm comes up, they are straining at the oars in the dark, and they see Jesus walking toward them on the water, and they are terrified, certain they are seeing a ghost. Scripture gives the reason plainly: they had gained no insight from the loaves; their hearts were hardened. The moment pressure returned, their perception snapped back to natural process. Water cannot be walked on. That is a fact. And the fact was, once again, louder than the God standing on it.
     A miracle can happen in front of a person whose imagination remains untouched. Israel saw the sea open and still feared the wilderness. The disciples saw the loaves multiply and still panicked in the storm. Nicodemus saw the signs and still could not see the kingdom. Seeing an act of God is not the same as receiving the sight of God.
We do the same. We watch God provide, and the next crisis reads as though the provision never happened — as though the world runs on its own machinery, as though the unseen has no vote. This is not always wickedness; often it is a habit of vision. We have been trained, by school and common sense and the sheer relentlessness of the visible, to treat the material world as the whole story. And a faith held only to what can be measured is already shrinking toward nothing.
That is why the life of faith always involves a kind of holy nonconformity. Not strangeness for its own sake, not withdrawal from people, not contempt for ordinary life, but a refusal to let the surrounding world do our seeing for us. Paul names it exactly: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.” The world presses a way of perceiving onto us — trust only the seen, believe only the measurable, let the visible situation have the last word — but the renewed mind quietly refuses. It reads the same events by a different light.
     This is what Scripture means when it calls a people set apart. Not superior, not sealed off, not untouched by ordinary grief or ordinary responsibility, but unwilling to be absorbed, unwilling to let the assumptions of the age become the frame through which we see God. A people who let the surrounding world supply all their meaning have, without noticing, handed their perception away. And perception, as Nicodemus shows us, is where faith is either kept or lost.
     For our seeing shapes our speaking, and finally our living. Israel saw the wilderness as abandonment, so they spoke against God, and then they turned back in unbelief. The ten spies saw fortified cities and giants, and every word of their report was accurate. Joshua and Caleb saw the same cities and the same giants, but they read them by the promise of God. The facts were identical. The perception was not. And the perception decided everything.
    So the question the night visitor was really being asked is the question set before every reader still. Not whether you can see the facts of your life, you can, and they are real, but whether you will let those facts become the whole story.
The poison in the blood was real. So was the bronze serpent, lifted up. The storm was real. So was the One walking toward them on the water. The cross was real. So was the Son of Man, lifted up, that whoever believes in Him should have eternal life.
     Nicodemus came by night with a question he thought was about how. Jesus gave him a question about sight, and that question still stands before every one of us. Christian faith does not ask us to pretend the facts are unreal — it does not ask us to deny what we see. It asks something harder: that we be born from above and given the second kind of sight, so that when we look at our own life, poison and storm and all, we no longer read only the branches, but perceive the wind — and turn our eyes to the One lifted up, who is life.
 Copyright 07/02/2026, Dane Boyles, Clearwater, FL 

Aprender a Ver: Nicodemo y las dos dimensiones del mundo  —  Juan 3
     Es de noche, y un hombre prudente ha venido con una pregunta que no podía hacer a la luz del día.
     Nicodemo era maestro, gobernante, un hombre acostumbrado a entender las cosas. Vino a Jesús con lo que suena como una conclusión ya asentada: “Sabemos que has venido de Dios como maestro; porque nadie puede hacer estas señales que tú haces, si no está Dios con él” (Juan 3:2). Había observado, había sopesado las evidencias, y había razonado hasta llegar a un veredicto respetuoso. Había visto con exactitud.
     Y Jesús le respondió con algo que, a primera vista, parece no tener nada que ver con la pregunta: “De cierto, de cierto te digo, que el que no naciere de nuevo, no puede ver el reino de Dios” (Juan 3:3).
     Fíjense en la palabra. No entrar primero, sino ver. Antes de cualquier otra cosa, Jesús pone el dedo sobre un problema de visión. Nicodemo no necesita primero más información. Necesita otra clase de vista.
     Tropieza exactamente donde esperaríamos que tropezara un hombre prudente. “¿Cómo puede un hombre nacer siendo viejo? ¿Puede acaso entrar por segunda vez en el vientre de su madre, y nacer?” (Juan 3:4). Es una pregunta justa, si uno lee solamente según el proceso natural. Nicodemo sabe cómo funciona el nacimiento. Lo ha observado, lo ha medido, lo ha archivado bajo las leyes fijas del mundo que puede tocar. Y según esas leyes, nacer de nuevo es un absurdo. Esa es la dificultad, y es tan nuestra como suya. Nicodemo intentaba comprender una realidad espiritual con un instrumento hecho solamente para la realidad material.
     Jesús aparta las dos para que podamos verlas con claridad: “Lo que es nacido de la carne, carne es; y lo que es nacido del Espíritu, espíritu es” (Juan 3:6). Le está mostrando que la realidad es más grande que el mundo visible. Está la carne, y está el Espíritu: lo que el ser humano puede percibir por naturaleza, y lo que solo Dios puede revelar. Una es el mundo que nuestros sentidos conocen: lo visto, lo medible, el mundo del ojo, del oído y del tacto. La otra es el orden invisible que nuestros sentidos nunca fueron hechos para alcanzar. En su centro vivo está el Espíritu de Dios, libre y no dominado por nosotros. Cada dimensión debe percibirse conforme a su propia naturaleza. No se puede pesar el viento en una balanza, y no se puede alcanzar lo invisible — y menos aún al Espíritu de Dios — por medio de los cinco sentidos.
Entonces Jesús toma precisamente esa imagen: “El viento sopla de donde quiere, y oyes su sonido; mas ni sabes de dónde viene, ni a dónde va; así es todo aquel que es nacido del Espíritu” (Juan 3:8).
     Nunca ves el viento mismo. Ves doblarse la rama; oyes el sonido entre los árboles; lo sientes en el rostro. Conoces el viento por sus efectos. Permanece invisible, y sin embargo nadie que esté de pie en medio de una tormenta duda de que es real. Esta es a menudo la forma de lo invisible: no se muestra directamente, sino que se muestra por aquello que mueve. Y hay una advertencia silenciosa dentro de la imagen. Una manera de ver que solo confía en lo que puede medir registrará las ramas que se mueven y no verá el viento. Registrará los efectos y negará la causa. Ve los hechos y se detiene allí.
     Por eso Jesús, unos versículos más adelante, dice algo que debería sacudirnos: “De cierto, de cierto te digo, que lo que sabemos hablamos, y lo que hemos visto, testificamos; y no recibís nuestro testimonio” (Juan 3:11). Él no es el que se esfuerza por percibir. Es el que ve con claridad, el que comprende sin vacío ni confusión cómo se unen lo invisible y lo visible, y le habla a gente sincera e inteligente que no puede seguirlo — no porque les falte buena voluntad, sino porque les falta la clase correcta de vista.
     Eso plantea la verdadera pregunta del pasaje. No simplemente: “¿Está allí lo invisible?”, sino: “¿Cuál realidad está gobernando?”
     La Escritura responde eso desde su primera página y nunca vacila. En el principio, el Dios invisible habla, y el mundo visible viene a la existencia. Dios habla desde lo invisible, y el mundo visible responde. Una y otra vez, los milagros insisten en la misma verdad. Israel sale de Egipto, no por la fuerza de un ejército, sino por un poder invisible que dobla los acontecimientos visibles hacia la libertad. El mar se abre. El pan cae del cielo. El agua brota de la roca. El patrón se vuelve inconfundible: cuando el Dios invisible actúa, el mundo visible obedece. Por eso Jesús puede decirle a Nicodemo, en efecto, que no hay nada extraño en esto. El Dios invisible siempre ha estado gobernando el mundo visible. Jesús solo le pide que lo note.
     Entonces Jesús hace algo notable. Se remonta a través de la historia de Israel, a una escena extraña en el desierto, y la usa para explicar su propia misión.
     El pueblo había sido mordido por serpientes. Estaban muriendo. El veneno ya estaba en la sangre, y no quedaba remedio natural alguno — no había cómo extirparlo, ni cómo esperar a que pasara, ni cómo manejarlo con fuerza humana. Y Dios le dijo a Moisés que levantara una serpiente de bronce sobre un asta, y dijo que todo aquel que hubiera sido mordido viviría al mirarla (Números 21:8–9). Solo mirar, y vivir.
     Pero, por supuesto, nunca fue un simple mirar. El poder no estaba en el metal. El poder estaba en el Dios que había unido su promesa a aquella señal levantada. Un hombre moribundo tenía que volver los ojos hacia lo único que Dios había señalado y confiar en ello — confiar en que la cura estaba fuera de sí mismo, en algo levantado ante él, cuando todo en su cuerpo le decía que estaba acabado. Tenía que leer su situación según la revelación, y no según el veneno en sus venas. Los que vivieron fueron los que miraron con fe.
     “Y como Moisés levantó la serpiente en el desierto”, dice Jesús, “así es necesario que el Hijo del Hombre sea levantado, para que todo aquel que en él cree no se pierda, mas tenga vida eterna” (Juan 3:14–15).
     Aquí toda la enseñanza sobre el ver llega a su punto culminante. Jesús no vino a condenar al mundo, sino a salvarlo. Él es el que fue levantado, y nosotros somos los que tenemos el veneno en la sangre, y el llamado es el mismo que fue en el desierto: mirar, y vivir. Pero mirar, entonces y ahora, significa apartarse de lo que nuestra situación parece estar diciéndonos y confiar en lo que Dios ha revelado. Es un acto de percepción antes de ser cualquier otra cosa.
     Y Nicodemo no está solo en esta falla de la vista; incluso los discípulos tuvieron que aprenderla. Acababan de ver a Jesús alimentar a miles de casi nada, habían visto al mundo material estirarse más allá de sus límites bajo una mano invisible. Entonces se levanta una tormenta, están remando con esfuerzo en la oscuridad, y ven a Jesús caminando hacia ellos sobre el agua, y se aterran, seguros de estar viendo un fantasma. La Escritura da la razón sin rodeos: “aún estaban endurecidos sus corazones”, porque no habían entendido lo de los panes (Marcos 6:52). En cuanto volvió la presión, su percepción retrocedió de golpe al proceso natural. No se puede caminar sobre el agua. Eso es un hecho. Y el hecho fue, una vez más, más fuerte que el Dios que estaba de pie sobre ella.
     Un milagro puede suceder delante de una persona cuya imaginación permanece intacta. Israel vio abrirse el mar y aún temió el desierto. Los discípulos vieron multiplicarse los panes y aún se aterraron en la tormenta. Nicodemo vio las señales y aún no pudo ver el reino. Ver un acto de Dios no es lo mismo que recibir la vista de Dios.
     Nosotros hacemos lo mismo. Vemos a Dios proveer, y la siguiente crisis se lee como si la provisión nunca hubiera ocurrido — como si el mundo funcionara con su propia maquinaria, como si lo invisible no tuviera voto. Esto no siempre es maldad; a menudo es un hábito de la vista. Hemos sido entrenados, por la escuela, por el sentido común y por la incesante insistencia de lo visible, a tratar el mundo material como si fuera toda la historia. Y una fe que se aferra solo a lo que puede medirse ya se está encogiendo hacia la nada.
     Por eso, la vida de fe siempre implica una especie de santa inconformidad — no rareza por la rareza misma, sino la negativa a dejar que el mundo que nos rodea vea por nosotros. Pablo lo describe con exactitud: “No os conforméis a este siglo, sino transformaos por medio de la renovación de vuestro entendimiento” (Romanos 12:2). El mundo presiona su manera de ver sobre nosotros — confía solo en lo visto, cree solo en lo medible, deja que la situación visible tenga la última palabra — y el entendimiento renovado, en silencio, se niega.
     Esto es lo que la Escritura quiere decir cuando llama a un pueblo apartado. No superior, no aislado, no ajeno al dolor ordinario ni a la responsabilidad ordinaria, sino que no se deja absorber — que no permite que las suposiciones de la época se conviertan en el marco a través del cual vemos a Dios. Un pueblo que deja que el mundo que lo rodea le provea todo su significado ha entregado, sin darse cuenta, su percepción. Y la percepción, como nos muestra Nicodemo, es donde la fe se conserva o se pierde.
     Porque nuestra manera de ver da forma a nuestra manera de hablar, y finalmente a nuestra manera de vivir. Israel vio el desierto como abandono, y por eso habló contra Dios, y luego se volvió atrás en incredulidad. Los diez espías vieron ciudades fortificadas y gigantes, y cada palabra de su informe era exacta. Josué y Caleb vieron las mismas ciudades y los mismos gigantes, pero las leyeron a la luz de la promesa de Dios. Los hechos eran idénticos. La percepción no lo era. Y la percepción lo decidió todo.
     Así que la pregunta que en realidad se le hacía al visitante de la noche es la pregunta que todavía se pone delante de cada lector. No si puedes ver los hechos de tu vida — puedes, y son reales — sino si dejarás que esos hechos se conviertan en toda la historia.
     El veneno en la sangre era real. También lo era la serpiente de bronce, levantada. La tormenta era real. También lo era Aquel que caminaba hacia ellos sobre el agua. La cruz era real. También lo era el Hijo del Hombre, levantado, para que todo aquel que en él cree tenga vida eterna.
     Nicodemo vino de noche con una pregunta que él creía que era sobre el cómo. Jesús le devolvió una pregunta sobre la vista, y esa pregunta todavía se mantiene delante de cada uno de nosotros. La fe cristiana no nos pide fingir que los hechos son irreales, no nos pide negar lo que vemos. Pide algo más difícil: que nazcamos de lo alto y se nos dé la segunda clase de vista, para que cuando miremos nuestra propia vida, con veneno y tormenta y todo, ya no leamos solamente las ramas, sino que percibamos el viento — y volvamos los ojos hacia Aquel que fue levantado, que es la vida.
 Copyright 07/02/2026, Dane Boyles, Clearwater, FL

0 Comments

The Voice That Writes the Night

6/12/2026

0 Comments

 
     The text comes at 4:47. Can you call me when you get a chance? Eight words. No detail. The office closes at five.
     You call back. It rings out. You leave a message. You set the phone on the counter, face up, and you wait.
     And here is what the mind does with thirteen minutes, and then a whole night, of nothing.
        It begins to write.
      It writes the diagnosis first, because that is the word that lives under every unexplained call from a doctor. Then it writes the second appointment, the one where they bring you into the smaller room with the softer chairs. It writes the phone call to your daughter. It writes the look on her face. It writes the treatment, the calendar reorganized around it, the hair, the drive home. It writes, somewhere past midnight, a version of the end. None of this has happened. None of it may ever happen. But the mind does not wait for evidence. It has a single piece of information and an entire night, and it will not sit in a room with an unfinished story. So it finishes it.
     This is the thing we rarely admit about fear. We call it worry, as if it were passive, something that happens to us. It isn’t. It’s work. It’s labor. All night you are bent over a desk you cannot see, authoring a future you have no authority to write, and in the morning you are exhausted, not because anything happened, but because you have been writing in the dark for hours.
     Scripture knows this kind of night. It knows it better than we give it credit for, because it is full of people who could not stop writing either.
     Go back to the oldest version of it. God promises Abraham a son, and then a nation through that son, and then, years later, the boy grown enough to carry wood up a hill, God asks for the boy back. Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and offer him. And then the text does the thing we never quite forgive it for. It makes Abraham walk. Three days. Genesis gives us the detail and then leaves us alone with it: he splits the wood, he sets out, and the place is far off.
     Three days is not a journey. Three days is a night like yours, stretched to the length of a man’s whole reserves. Three days of a mind with one piece of information — offer him — and all the time in the world to write the rest. We are not told what Abraham composed on that road. We are only told that he kept walking, and that when the boy asked his question — where is the lamb? — the old man said only, God will provide. Not because he could see how. Because he had stopped trying to write the ending himself.
    That is the part we miss when we turn these stories into lessons about courage. It was never courage in the sense of feeling brave. It was a refusal to pick up the pen. Abraham had learned the one thing the whole night is trying to teach us: that the loudest, most reasonable, most evidence-rich voice in the room is not the voice that gets to say what is true.
    Because fear is reasonable. That is its whole disguise. It never arrives shouting. It arrives explaining. It lays out the evidence. It builds the case. It sounds, more than anything, responsible, as though to imagine the worst were a form of preparing for it, a duty you owe the people you love. And not one word of it was true, and you spent yourself writing it anyway.
    The psalm that has carried people through nights like this does not begin where you’d expect. Psalm 46 was written for people who knew real instability, not metaphorical shaking but the literal kind: cities under siege, the ground itself coming apart. Though the earth give way and the mountains fall into the heart of the sea. And yet the psalm does not open with the earthquake. It opens with God. God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble. It looks straight at the catastrophe and refuses to let the catastrophe speak first.
    And then, near the end, it says the thing. The thing we’ve reduced to a fridge magnet, a soft word for a hard day. Be still.
    We hear it as calm down. Relax. Breathe. But that is not what the word is doing. The Hebrew is closer to let go: drop your hands, cease, stop striving. It is not spoken to someone who is panicking. It is spoken to someone who is working. It is a command to the combatant to lower the weapon, to the author to put down the pen. Be still, and know that I am God. Stop writing. There is already an Author, and it is not you, and it never was.
     This matters more than the comfortable version lets on. Because notice when the psalm says it. Not after the rescue. Not once the waters have receded and the report comes back clean. It says be still while the mountains are still falling into the sea. Stillness is not what you get to feel after the good news. It is what you are asked for in the dark, before you know anything, with the phone face up on the counter and the whole night ahead.
      So, I am not going to tell you the nurse called back and said it was nothing.
     Maybe she did. Often, she does. But a faith that only works when the news is good is not faith; it is optimism with a religious accent, and it will not survive the night it is actually needed. The promise of the psalm is not that the call will be nothing. The promise is that there is solid ground to stand on while you wait to find out, ground that does not move when the report does. The world changes. The body changes. The number on the screen changes. The One the psalm begins with does not. That does not answer the question you are afraid to ask. It gives you something better than an answer. It gives you a place to stand while the answer is still unknown.
     It is late now. The phone is on the counter. You don’t know yet what the morning holds, and the mind is reaching, as it always reaches, for the pen.
        Put it down.
      You were never the one writing this. You are only the one who has to take the next small faithful step, to turn off the light and lie down in a story whose ending you do not get to author. Down the hall your daughter is asleep, knowing nothing of the night you have spent, and the call you rehearsed to her has not come and may never come. Only the morning is coming. And you can trust that the Author has not, even for one minute of this long night, left the room.

Copyright 06-12-2026, Dane Boyles, Dunedin, FL

La Voz que Escribe la Noche

     El mensaje llega a las 4:47. ¿Puedes llamarme cuando tengas un momento? Ocho palabras. Ningún detalle. La oficina cierra a las cinco.
     Devuelves la llamada. Suena y suena sin respuesta. Dejas un mensaje. Pones el teléfono sobre la mesada, con la pantalla hacia arriba, y esperas.
     Y esto es lo que la mente hace con trece minutos, y luego con una noche entera, de nada.
     Empieza a escribir.
​     Escribe primero el diagnóstico, porque esa es la palabra que vive debajo de toda llamada inexplicable de un médico. Después escribe la segunda cita, esa en la que te llevan a la sala más pequeña, la de las sillas más blandas. Escribe la llamada telefónica a tu hija. Escribe la expresión de su rostro. Escribe el tratamiento, el calendario reorganizado en torno a él, el cabello, el regreso a casa. Escribe, en algún momento pasada la medianoche, una versión del final. Nada de esto ha ocurrido. Puede que nada de esto ocurra jamás. Pero la mente no espera la evidencia. Tiene un solo dato y una noche entera, y no se quedará sentada en una habitación con una historia sin terminar. Así que la termina.
     Esto es lo que rara vez admitimos acerca del miedo. Lo llamamos preocupación, como si fuera algo pasivo, algo que nos sucede. No lo es. Es trabajo. Es labor. Toda la noche estás inclinado sobre un escritorio que no puedes ver, redactando un futuro que no tienes autoridad para escribir, y a la mañana estás agotado, no porque algo haya sucedido, sino porque has estado escribiendo en la oscuridad durante horas.
     La Escritura conoce esta clase de noche. La conoce mejor de lo que le reconocemos, porque está llena de personas que tampoco podían dejar de escribir.
     Vuelve a la versión más antigua de todas. Dios le promete a Abraham un hijo, y luego una nación por medio de ese hijo, y luego, años después, ya crecido el muchacho lo suficiente para cargar la leña cuesta arriba, Dios le pide de vuelta al muchacho. Toma ahora tu hijo, tu único, Isaac, a quien amas, y ofrécelo. Y entonces el texto hace lo que nunca del todo le perdonamos. Hace caminar a Abraham. Tres días. Génesis nos da el detalle y luego nos deja a solas con él: parte la leña, se pone en marcha, y el lugar está lejos.
     Tres días no es un viaje. Tres días es una noche como la tuya, estirada hasta el largo de todas las reservas de un hombre. Tres días de una mente con un solo dato, ofrécelo, y todo el tiempo del mundo para escribir lo demás. No se nos dice qué compuso Abraham en aquel camino. Solo se nos dice que siguió caminando, y que cuando el muchacho hizo su pregunta — ¿dónde está el cordero? — el anciano dijo solamente: Dios proveerá. No porque pudiera ver cómo. Sino porque había dejado de intentar escribir él mismo el final.
     Esa es la parte que se nos escapa cuando convertimos estas historias en lecciones sobre el valor. Nunca fue valor en el sentido de sentirse valiente. Fue una negativa a tomar la pluma. Abraham había aprendido lo único que toda la noche intenta enseñarnos: que la voz más fuerte, más razonable, más cargada de evidencia en la habitación no es la voz a la que le toca decir qué es verdad.
     Porque el miedo es razonable. Ese es todo su disfraz. Nunca llega gritando. Llega explicando. Expone la evidencia. Construye el caso. Suena, más que cualquier otra cosa, responsable, como si imaginar lo peor fuera una forma de prepararse para ello, un deber que les debes a las personas que amas. Y ni una palabra de todo aquello era verdad, y aun así te gastaste escribiéndolo.
     El salmo que ha llevado a la gente a través de noches como esta no comienza donde uno esperaría. El Salmo 46 fue escrito para personas que conocían la inestabilidad real, no un temblor metafórico sino el literal: ciudades bajo asedio, la tierra misma viniéndose abajo. Aunque la tierra sea removida, y se traspasen los montes al corazón del mar. Y sin embargo el salmo no comienza con el terremoto. Comienza con Dios. Dios es nuestro amparo y fortaleza, nuestro pronto auxilio en las tribulaciones. Mira de frente la catástrofe y se niega a dejar que la catástrofe hable primero.
     Y luego, cerca del final, dice aquello. Aquello que hemos reducido a un imán de heladera, una palabra suave para un día difícil. Estad quietos.
     Lo oímos como cálmate. Relájate. Respira. Pero no es eso lo que la palabra está haciendo. El hebreo se acerca más a soltar: baja las manos, cesa, deja de esforzarte. No se le dice a alguien que está en pánico. Se le dice a alguien que está trabajando. Es una orden al combatiente de bajar el arma, al autor de soltar la pluma. Estad quietos, y conoced que yo soy Dios. Deja de escribir. Ya hay un Autor, y no eres tú, y nunca lo fuiste.
     Esto importa más de lo que la versión cómoda deja ver. Porque fíjate cuándo lo dice el salmo. No después del rescate. No una vez que las aguas se han retirado y el informe vuelve limpio. Dice estad quietos mientras los montes todavía se están desplomando en el mar. La quietud no es lo que llegas a sentir después de la buena noticia. Es lo que se te pide en la oscuridad, antes de que sepas nada, con el teléfono boca arriba sobre la mesada y toda la noche por delante.
     Así que no voy a decirte que la enfermera volvió a llamar y dijo que no era nada.
    Tal vez lo hizo. A menudo, así es. Pero una fe que solo funciona cuando la noticia es buena no es fe; es optimismo con acento religioso, y no sobrevivirá la noche en que de verdad se la necesita. La promesa del salmo no es que la llamada será nada. La promesa es que hay tierra firme sobre la cual estar de pie mientras esperas averiguarlo, tierra que no se mueve cuando el informe cambia. El mundo cambia. El cuerpo cambia. El número en la pantalla cambia. Aquel con quien el salmo comienza no cambia. Eso no responde la pregunta que temes hacer. Te da algo mejor que una respuesta. Te da un lugar donde estar de pie mientras la respuesta sigue siendo desconocida.
Ya es tarde. El teléfono está sobre la mesada. Aún no sabes lo que traerá la mañana, y la mente se estira, como siempre se estira, hacia la pluma.
Suéltala.
     Nunca fuiste tú quien escribía esto. Eres solamente quien tiene que dar el próximo pequeño paso fiel, apagar la luz y recostarse dentro de una historia cuyo final no te toca a ti escribir. Al fondo del pasillo tu hija duerme, sin saber nada de la noche que has pasado, y la llamada que le ensayaste no ha llegado y puede que nunca llegue. Solo la mañana viene en camino. Y puedes confiar en que el Autor no ha dejado la habitación, ni por un solo minuto de esta larga noche.
​
Copyright 06-12-2026, Dane Boyles, Dunedin, FL
​
0 Comments

Truth You Meet Instead of Truth You Have

5/30/2026

0 Comments

 
I’ve always found it odd that when John sets out to tell us who Jesus is, he doesn’t reach for big words. He reaches for water and blood. Not lightning, not thunder from a mountain. Water and blood, the two most common things there are. They show up at every birth and every wound.
     But the strangeness is the point, and it runs deeper than the words. By the end of these few verses, John is going to tell us something that quietly undoes how most of us think. He's going to say truth isn't mainly something you have. It's someone you meet. Hold that thought, because everything else here is leaning toward it.

This is the one who came by water and blood, Jesus Christ. He did not come by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. (1 John 5:6)
​
I would rather not walk you through this verse by verse. I'd rather pull out a few ideas that I don't think any of us can really stay neutral about once we've seen them.

The Man Who Came from Outside

     Most of the people we look up to started somewhere. They were born, they grew up, they became someone. John keeps pointing out that Jesus is the exception. Jesus didn't start here. He came here.
     That one word, “came,” tells you a lot. You wouldn't say someone “came” from the next room. You’d say it about someone who traveled a long way to reach you. And John is telling us Jesus traveled the longest way there is. He was already there before time began, and then he stepped into it.
     He came in two ways, and that's why we get both water and blood. Now, people have read “water” in more than one way. Some hear baptism in it, and that’s a fair instinct in a letter like this. I take it to mean his birth, his arrival as a real human being, and I think the pairing with blood points that direction. You can read it differently and still arrive at John’s main point. So, take water as the birth, a real one. Nine months in a womb, a body that got tired and hungry, a life you could have watched grow up. Whatever else Jesus was, he wasn’t a rumor or a story that got bigger every time someone told it. He was a man you could have stood next to.
     Blood is the death. And this is where it gets interesting. Blood usually means something has ended. But in Jesus’ story, blood means rescue. It’s the word for sacrifice, for one person stepping into the spot meant for another, for a price being paid so somebody else can go free.
     Put those two together and you see a life that was never an accident. He was born in order to die, and he died on purpose. That leaves me with a hard question about my own life. If his suffering meant something, what about mine? John doesn’t let us pretend otherwise. He never promised that following God and avoiding pain were the same road.

When Truth Stops Being Something You Have and Starts Being Someone

Watch what John does with the Spirit. He could have said the Spirit speaks the truth or shows us the truth. Instead, he says something much bigger: 6 …the Spirit is the truth. (1 John 5:6) 
​

Read that again. Not tells the truth. Is the truth. We don’t usually think about truth that way. For us, truth is something you have, a fact you got right and can keep in your pocket. But John is talking about truth as a Person, someone you either know or you don’t. That changes the whole thing. You can’t research your way in. You must actually meet him.
     And here’s where it costs us something. If truth is a Person, then I am not its author. I don’t get to assemble it to my liking. I receive it from someone outside myself, the way I’d receive the word of an honest friend. That’s a humbling place to stand, and it’s exactly the place our age refuses to stand.
     We've all heard people say, “That’s true for you,” or “You have to find your truth.” It sounds open-minded and kind. But look at what it really does. It makes truth something we invent instead of something we find. And once truth is something we make up, we can get rid of anything we don't like, God included. We end up treating the world we can see as if it had nothing to do with the God we can’t.
     Don't rush past that last line, because it’s the quiet mistake underneath so many loud ones. The visible and the invisible were never meant to live in separate rooms. The God we can’t see made the world we can, stitched meaning into it, and then stepped into it himself. To cut the seen off from the unseen is to live in half a world and call it the whole thing.
     John won't go along with that. He gives us three witnesses, the Spirit and the water and the blood, and he says they all agree, the way honest witnesses always do. The world we see and the world we don't are telling the same story, and Jesus is where they come together. He's the one holding it all in one piece.
​     And here's what really gets me. If Jesus' whole life was a testimony, and we're supposed to be his body now, then our lives are meant to say what his said. People are reading us the same way they once read him. I have to ask myself what they're finding when they do.

You Can’t Quietly Disbelieve God

​We’d all like to think there's a safe middle, a polite shrug where we don't really accept Jesus but don't really reject him either. John takes that option away, and he's blunt about it.

​10 Whoever does not believe God has made him out to be a liar… (1 John 5:10)

Look how strong that is. John is saying that when God goes to the trouble of sending his own Son to settle the question, leaving us no real reason to doubt, then brushing it off isn’t a neutral move. It’s an answer. It’s looking God in the face and telling him you don't believe him.
     That’s hard to hear, but I think it’s honest. Most of us don’t reject God with a raised fist. We do it with a shrug, with a “maybe later,” with an excuse so reasonable we never notice we've just called him a liar. John is only saying out loud what the shrug already means. And the shrug is never as harmless as it feels. Unbelief always travels somewhere, even when it moves slowly and quietly and never once raises its voice.
    Maybe that’s worth praying back to God, not as some grand statement, just an honest one: I don’t want to believe any more lies. I don’t want to be run by them or fooled by them or made comfortable with them. It’s a harder prayer to mean than it looks.

The Sentence It All Comes Down To

After all of that, the witnesses, the warning, the weight of it, John ends on one line so plain a child could carry it:

12 Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. (1 John 5:12)

That's the whole thing. The water and the blood and the Spirit, the entire case, comes down to whether you have the Son. Not whether you earned life or built it for yourself. You receive it, because it was a gift all along, and it was only ever in one place. Have the Son, and you have life.
     I know how simple that sounds. Believing it is the work of a lifetime. But take heart, because the One who hands us this life is the same One who keeps walking toward us to give it. He isn’t waiting for us to figure him out. He’s still doing the very thing John wrote all of this to show us.
     If something here got hold of you, stay with verse 12 this week. Read it slowly each morning and ask yourself one question. Not “do I agree with this?” but “do I have him?” That’s the question John was asking all along.
 
Copyright 05-30-2026, Dane Boyles, Dunedin, FL
0 Comments

By the Rivers of Babylon

5/25/2026

0 Comments

 

     By the rivers of Babylon," there we sat down and wept. It is one of the most beautiful opening lines in the Hebrew Scriptures. By the end of the same psalm, the poet is asking God to bless anyone who would seize Babylonian infants and dash them against the rocks. Most of us, if we are honest, have no idea what to do with that.
     We have been taught what to do with the first half. We have hymns built on it, sermons that quote it, and paintings that hang in seminary hallways of harps in willow branches and exiles weeping by the water. We have not been taught what to do with the second half. So mostly, we do not do anything with it. We read the opening verses aloud in worship and stop where it gets uncomfortable. We skip ahead to Psalm 138. We tell ourselves the angry psalms were a phase the people of God had to pass through on their way to something better. We quote Jesus on loving enemies and move on. And after enough years, the avoidance feels like reverence.
     But the psalm is still there. It does not leave because we have stopped looking at it. It sits in the book, between psalms we love, waiting.
     I have a friend who could not look away. He lost his faith in a textual criticism class, which is not where I would have predicted, but it is where it happened. He had gone to seminary the way many of us do—already a believer, looking for tools, expecting his love for Scripture to deepen the way a carpenter's love for wood deepens when he learns the grain. What he found instead was fluorescent light, a professor, and a screen full of verses that did not match. Manuscripts that disagreed. Verses that appeared in some traditions and vanished in others. Endings to the Gospel of Mark that multiplied like rumors. By the end of the term, he could not pray. By the end of the year, he could not stay. I have not seen him in a long while.
     I think about him whenever I come to Psalm 137. Not because the psalm has anything to do with manuscripts, but because it produces the same vertigo by a different route, and the question is the same: whether to stay with a book that will not behave.
​     It was the year my family went through heavy and hard things, a season we are still, in many ways, living inside, that I finally stopped looking away. I do not recommend coming to Psalm 137 this way. But I do not know that there is another way. I had thought, before, that the work would be to explain the psalm, to historicize it, to soften it, to make it acceptable. What happened instead was that the psalm began to explain me. I realized the psalm frightened me because I recognized the man speaking.
     I had not known, until then, how much rage I was carrying about things done to people I love. I had not known how often I had asked God, in the basement of my own mind, for something to happen to someone. I had been in ministry for many years by then. I had sat with people through grief and abuse and betrayal. I had said the right things. And underneath the right things, in a chamber I did not visit often, there was a poet sitting by a river with a harp in the branches wishing terrible things on the people who had destroyed his city.
     The psalm did not bless what I found there. But it did something more important. It told me the truth about it. It refused to let me pretend I was a more peaceful person than I was. And in refusing, it began, slowly and against my own resistance, to do the work that peaceful people require, which is not the suppression of rage but the honest carrying of it before God. Not because rage is holy, but because hidden rage becomes something worse. A Scripture that hides human darkness would eventually fail the people living inside one.
     What unsettles me now is not that the psalm exists. What unsettles me is that God preserved it. The prayer was not edited out. Heaven heard those words and still preserved them among the songs of worship. Which means God's willingness to hear broken people exceeds my willingness to admit what is inside them.
     This is what I wish I could tell my friend, if I could find him. The crisis you had in that classroom was real. The variants are real. The manuscripts disagree, and the disagreements matter, and no one who tells you otherwise is being honest with you. But the question underneath the crisis was not really about manuscripts. It was about whether a text can be trusted to tell you the truth when it will not behave the way you want it to. And the answer the people of God have given for thousands of years is yes. Not because the text always comforts. Not because the text always coheres. But because the text is doing something more interesting than either of those things. It is forming a people who can stand inside their own grief and rage and confusion and not be destroyed by them, because they have a place to bring such things, and Someone who will receive them.
     Psalm 137 did not become my favorite psalm. I doubt it will ever be anyone's favorite psalm. But I no longer skip it, and I no longer apologize for it, and I have come to believe that a Bible without it would be a smaller and less honest book, a book that knew less about us than this one does.
     The passages we want to remove are often the passages that know us best. And the God who gave us this strange, layered, contested, beautiful book did not give it to us to settle our questions. He gave it to us to make us into the kind of people who can live faithfully inside questions that will not be settled. I am still praying for my friend. I hope he is still reading, somewhere, even if he will not yet call it that.
     I hope someone has told him that the door he walked out of is not the only door, and that the room he is looking for has more than one way in. He learned too early that verses do not always agree. I hope one day he learns they still sing.
     And I hope, if he ever sits down by a river and weeps, that he remembers there is a psalm for that. Even silence, in the Psalms, still counts as prayer. Copyright 05-25-2026, Dane Boyles, Clearwater, FL


Junto a los Ríos de Babilonia:
Una reflexión sobre el Salmo 137    

   “Junto a los ríos de Babilonia, allí nos sentábamos, y aun llorábamos.”
     Es uno de los versos iniciales más hermosos de las Escrituras hebreas. Para el final de ese mismo salmo, el poeta le está pidiendo a Dios que bendiga a cualquiera que tome a los niños pequeños de Babilonia y los estrelle contra las peñas. La mayoría de nosotros, si somos sinceros, no tenemos idea de qué hacer con eso.
     Nos han enseñado qué hacer con la primera mitad. Tenemos himnos construidos sobre ella, sermones que la citan, y pinturas colgadas en los pasillos de los seminarios: arpas en las ramas de los sauces y desterrados llorando junto al agua. No nos han enseñado qué hacer con la segunda mitad. Así que, la mayor parte del tiempo, no hacemos nada con ella. Leemos los versículos iniciales en voz alta en el culto y nos detenemos donde se vuelve incómodo. Saltamos al Salmo 138. Nos decimos que los salmos de ira fueron una etapa que el pueblo de Dios tuvo que atravesar en su camino hacia algo mejor. Citamos a Jesús sobre amar a los enemigos y seguimos adelante. Y después de suficientes años, la evasión empieza a sentirse como reverencia.
     Pero el salmo sigue ahí. No se va porque hayamos dejado de mirarlo. Está en el libro, entre salmos que amamos, esperando. Tengo un amigo que no pudo apartar la mirada. Perdió su fe en una clase de crítica textual, que no es donde yo lo habría predicho, pero es donde ocurrió. Había ido al seminario como muchos de nosotros lo hacemos, ya creyente, buscando herramientas, esperando que su amor por la Escritura se profundizara del modo en que el amor de un carpintero por la madera se profundiza cuando aprende la veta. Lo que encontró en cambio fue luz fluorescente, un profesor, y una pantalla llena de versículos que no coincidían. Manuscritos que discrepaban. Versículos que aparecían en algunas tradiciones y se desvanecían en otras. Finales del Evangelio de Marcos que se multiplicaban como rumores. Para el final del semestre, no podía orar. Para el final del año, no podía quedarse. No lo he visto en mucho tiempo.
     Pienso en él cada vez que llego al Salmo 137. No porque el salmo tenga algo que ver con los manuscritos, sino porque produce el mismo vértigo por otra ruta, y la pregunta es la misma: si quedarse con un libro que no se porta bien.
     Fue el año en que mi familia atravesó cosas pesadas y duras, una temporada dentro de la cual, en muchos sentidos, todavía estamos viviendo, cuando por fin dejé de apartar la mirada. No recomiendo llegar al Salmo 137 de esta manera. Pero no sé si haya otra manera. Había pensado, antes, que la tarea sería explicar el salmo, historizarlo, suavizarlo, hacerlo aceptable. Lo que ocurrió en cambio fue que el salmo empezó a explicarme a mí. Me di cuenta de que el salmo me asustaba porque reconocía al hombre que hablaba.
     No había sabido, hasta entonces, cuánta rabia cargaba por cosas hechas a personas que amo. No había sabido con cuánta frecuencia le había pedido a Dios, en el sótano de mi propia mente, que algo le sucediera a alguien. Para entonces llevaba ya muchos años en el ministerio. Había acompañado a personas a través del duelo, del abuso y de la traición. Había dicho las cosas correctas. Y debajo de las cosas correctas, en una cámara que no visitaba a menudo, había un poeta sentado junto a un río con un arpa en las ramas, deseando cosas terribles sobre la gente que había destruido su ciudad.
     El salmo no bendijo lo que encontré allí. Pero hizo algo más importante. Me dijo la verdad al respecto. Se negó a dejarme fingir que yo era una persona más apacible de lo que era. Y al negarse, comenzó, lentamente y contra mi propia resistencia, a hacer la obra que las personas apacibles requieren, que no es la supresión de la rabia sino el llevarla con honestidad delante de Dios. No porque la rabia sea santa, sino porque la rabia escondida se convierte en algo peor. Una Escritura que escondiera la oscuridad humana terminaría por fallarles a las personas que viven dentro de una.
     Lo que me inquieta ahora no es que el salmo exista. Lo que me inquieta es que Dios lo haya preservado. La oración no fue eliminada. El cielo oyó aquellas palabras y aun así las preservó entre los cánticos de adoración. Lo cual significa que la disposición de Dios a escuchar a las personas quebrantadas excede mi disposición a admitir lo que hay dentro de ellas. Esto es lo que quisiera poder decirle a mi amigo, si pudiera encontrarlo. La crisis que tuviste en aquel salón fue real. Las variantes son reales. Los manuscritos discrepan, y las discrepancias importan, y nadie que te diga lo contrario está siendo honesto contigo. Pero la pregunta debajo de la crisis no era en realidad sobre los manuscritos. Era sobre si un texto puede confiarse en que te diga la verdad cuando no se porta como tú quieres. Y la respuesta que el pueblo de Dios ha dado durante miles de años es sí. No porque el texto siempre consuele. No porque el texto siempre sea coherente. Sino porque el texto está haciendo algo más interesante que cualquiera de esas dos cosas. Está formando a un pueblo que puede estar de pie dentro de su propio duelo, su rabia y su confusión sin ser destruido por ellos, porque tiene un lugar donde llevar tales cosas, y a Alguien que las recibirá.
     El Salmo 137 no se convirtió en mi salmo favorito. Dudo que llegue a ser jamás el salmo favorito de nadie. Pero ya no lo salto, y ya no me disculpo por él, y he llegado a creer que una Biblia sin él sería un libro más pequeño y menos honesto, un libro que sabría menos de nosotros de lo que este sabe.
     Los pasajes que queremos quitar son a menudo los pasajes que mejor nos conocen. Y el Dios que nos dio este libro extraño, estratificado, disputado y hermoso no nos lo dio para resolver nuestras preguntas. Nos lo dio para hacer de nosotros la clase de personas que pueden vivir con fidelidad dentro de preguntas que no serán resueltas.
     Sigo orando por mi amigo. Espero que siga leyendo, en algún lugar, aunque todavía no quiera llamarlo así.
     Espero que alguien le haya dicho que la puerta por la que salió no es la única puerta, y que la habitación que busca tiene más de una entrada.
     Aprendió demasiado temprano que los versículos no siempre coinciden. Espero que algún día aprenda que todavía cantan.
     Y espero, si alguna vez se sienta junto a un río y llora, que recuerde que hay un salmo para eso. Aun el silencio, en los Salmos, todavía cuenta como oración.

​Copyright 25-05-2026, Dane Boyles, Clearwater, FL



0 Comments

Deception is his Priority

12/2/2018

0 Comments

 
​The Day of Atonement involves not only the forgiveness of sin; it pictures the removal of the primary cause of sin-Satan and his demons. Until God removes the original instigator of sin, mankind will simply continue to fall back into disobedience and suffering. Although our human nature has a part to play in our sins, Satan the devil bears great responsibility for influencing mankind to disobey God.
 
Even though many people doubt the existence of a devil, the Bible reveals Satan as a powerful, invisible being who can sway all mankind. Revelation 12:9 tells us that his influence is so great that he “deceives the whole world.”
 
The devil blinds people to the understanding of God’s truth. The apostle Paul explained this to the Corinthians: If “our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them” (2 Corinthians 4:3-4).
 
Paul also teaches us that Satan has influenced every human to walk in the ways of disobedience. He notes that those called into God’s church “once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience” (Ephesians 2:2).

Del Rio, TX
0 Comments

Worship, a Choice or a Command?

11/18/2018

0 Comments

 
​Praise and worship seems to be universal. Have you ever heard of an explorer finding a new tribe or culture that doesn’t worship? Worship is a natural instinct and a basic need for every person. A simple definition of worship is to regard with great devotion or to honor as a divine being. Take a second to think about what you are most devoted to in this life and ask yourself, “Is it worthy of my devotion; do I worship a divine being?”
 
We don’t all worship the same God, but everyone worships something or someone. Since we all worship, we should question the reason for this desire. The most logical conclusion is that we were created by a higher being for the very purpose of worship.
 
The ongoing quest of man is to find answers to the fundamental questions of human origin, human nature, and human destiny. There is one book that has the answers to all these questions, including our questions about worship. The Bible is the wonderful and mysterious book that God has chosen as a way to communicate with us.
 
God is the focus of our devotion in both the Old Testament and the New Testament. In Exodus 20:2-3, God says, “I am the LORD your God .....You shall have no other gods before me.” In Matthew 4:10, Jesus says, “Worship the Lord your God and serve him only.” So, worship is not merely a natural instinct, it’s a command from God. 

​Del Rio, TX
​
0 Comments

NO JUDGMENT? AS IF!

11/4/2018

0 Comments

 
Why was God even involved with judging Sodom & Gomorrah? Why judge the Canaanites or Israel? Why did God use the Assyrians against Samaria and later the Babylonians against Assyria and Israel? What would have happened if God did not intervene with his “strange work” of divine judgment on Mount Zion (Is 28:21)?

Let’s consider the opposite: what would the world look like if God did not intervene in upholding justice among the nations? It would be like Genesis 6:5–the consequences of leaving mankind to his own devices. It seems obvious that man needs God’s intervention to prevent the total decay of society. The natural course of sin is destruction. The LORD has to be involved in curbing the natural path of man’s self-destruction if man and creation are to survive. God is involved with the nations for at least the following reasons:

1. Part of God’s purpose is bringing men to repentance. By bringing about consequences to ungodly actions, man is reminded that the evil course brings negative results (Is 30:12-14). The roller coaster history in Judges is another portrayal of this (see Judges 2:10-23). Another illustrious example is found in Daniel when God humbles Nebuchadnezzer (Dan 4:37), resulting in repentance and worship of the LORD. As the LORD says in Ezekiel “Repent!” “Why will you die?” “I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked”(18:30-32; 33:11)


2. In order for God to bring men to maturity he has to intervene among the nations (Judges 2:22). This points out that God used the Canaanite nations to test whether the Israelites would keep the way of the Lord. “The Lord was grieved that he had made man on the earth and his heart was filled with pain” (Ge 6:6). It hurt God to watch man become evil – the opposite of God’s nature. The opposite of what God had intended for man.
It would have been unloving for a God of love to watch his creation be devoured by sin. God had to either destroy man all together or work among man’s affairs to redeem him from sin. This highlights God character and urges us to want to know more about Him.


It is true that the justice of God eludes human comprehension, as in the case of Abraham concerning the destruction of Sodom & Gomorrah. This is because God’s ways are higher than man’s ways (Is 55:9) and therefore it is necessary that God intervene if true justice is to bless the earth.

1. The abuse of power. “Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” The result is oppression of others (c.f. Assyria). This was not God’s plan. In his laws we see many commands requiring that we judge rightly and without partiality (Lev 19:11-18), that we help the weak rather than run over them or take advantage of them (Ex 22:23-24). Yahweh’s just nature cannot remain indifferent to those crying out to him because of ill-treatment. “For the Lord is a God of justice, Blessed are all who wait for Him!” (Is 30:18). God is the champion of those who are victimized by power and acts to put down the mighty and exalt those of low degree as affirmed in Mary’s Magnificant (Luke 1:46-55). Why is a champion for the victimized necessary? Because God has determined that those who rule will rule with in righteousness and justice (Is 32:1)

2. Fairness to the righteous –Even if only a few chose to be faithful to God, love requires that some help is given to them in going against the current of the unrighteous. (c.f. Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego are saved from the furnace for being faithful to God, Dan 3:16-18). If none was given, a pagan nation would conclude there is no God in heaven and that living righteously has no reward.

3. God hates evil and wickedness – Unlike man who tolerates or is indifferent to evil, Yahweh is holy and hates wickedness. In the book of Daniel God punishes for his arrogance and has him live as an insane person with the beasts of the field (Dan 4:33).  God does this “so that the living may know that the Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes and sets the lowliest of men (Dan 4:17). It seems God has determined to be involved with nations to control man’s incessant arrogance. The tendency to think that by our own strength and genius we have achieved and acquired what we have is not true. God will not have his blessings taken for granted by man’s self-centeredness. It is only right that God is on the throne and regarded so, not man.  “The Lord will cause men to hear his majestic voice,” (Is 30:30)
Without God’s intervention the powerful ungodly can quickly bring all of man down to destruction. Whereas with God’s involvement, there will be a remnant of mankind that will find peace with God and become God’s house in eternity.
Del Rio, TX

0 Comments
Site powered by Weebly. Managed by Hostgator
  • Home
  • About
  • Ministry
  • Publications
  • Recent Reflections
  • Contact